III) During the Model in the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Edition) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed towards the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
four. Record shows that the petitioner continues to be booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Though the petitioner has obtained bail in These cases, it does, prima facie, set up that the petitioner is at risk of repeating the offence.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons getting their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to perform absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced on the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
four. It goes without declaring that observations made hereinabove are just tentative in nature and strictly confined to the disposal of instant bail petition.
If a victim is shot at point-blank assortment, it could still be fair to infer that the accused meant death. However, that isn't always the case.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
Accessing free case regulation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and any individual seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
When the petitioner is actually present with the place of prevalence without causing any injury to the deceased or PWs then in these kinds of circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided via the acquired trial Court after recording from the evidence.
Hence, it absolutely was held that the right to your healthy environment was part in the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and 14 from the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all sides of human existence, all these kinds of amenities and facilities that a person is entitled to delight in with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to a person, by performing an act which inside the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently risky that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death with the such person, check here is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) of your Pakistan Constitution gives primary jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and acknowledged scientists to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.